Media Training: When Reporters Bully You

Employment - Media Training: When Reporters Bully You

Hi friends. Today, I discovered Employment - Media Training: When Reporters Bully You. Which is very helpful in my experience and you. Media Training: When Reporters Bully You

Under Fire

What I said. It just isn't the final outcome that the true about Employment. You check out this article for home elevators an individual need to know is Employment.

Employment

A friend whose assosication is often in the media spotlight recently told me a story about her boss. Her boss, let's call her Susan, is on the leadership team for a lobbying group that represents a somewhat unpopular industry.

Susan was interviewed a few months ago by Dateline Nbc Correspondent Lea Thompson about a topic that could make her assosication look bad. She knew she'd have to respond tough questions.

Nervous about saying something embarrassing about her organization, Susan considered prepared for the interview. She advanced her main messages, plan about the worst questions she could maybe face and practiced her responses.

When the interview began, Susan stayed on message. Thompson tried to throw her off, but Susan wouldn't budge. Thompson pushed and prodded, trying to get Susan to say something - anyone - more controversial. She wouldn't.

That's when Ms. Thompson employed the old journalistic trick of trying to intimidate her subject. In middle of the interview, Ms. Thompson asked the cameraman to stop recording, scolded Susan for not answering her questions, and asked for a five wee break.

And my sources tell me that this is not the first time Ms. Thompson has used this tactic - she's used it before with at least one other interviewee from a dissimilar organization.

An fresh spokesperson would have been flustered. He or she would have returned from the break with something dissimilar to say. Not Susan. She knew that Dateline Nbc was simply a conduit to a larger audience and that she had full operate of her own words.

It worked. When the interview aired, Susan's quotes were right on message. By sticking to her messages and consistently repeating her most important points, she ensured that Dateline's millions of viewers heard the most important things she had to say.

Why Can'T I Be More...Real?

The trainees I work with often wonder if they wouldn't have more credibility if they acknowledged a few of their own weaknesses while an interview, instead of being perfectly on message. Doing so is occasionally appropriate, but here's why it's dangerous:

1. The respond you give which points out your own shortcomings will be the one that is used. Your other answers - including your safe bet points - will be edited out.

2. It is not your job to be your own critic - that is the job of the reporter and your opponents quoted in the piece. In order for a truly "balanced" piece, you have to be safe bet toward yourself - your opponents will happily point out your imperfections for you.

But Be Careful

I'd like to raise three cautions with this approach. First, frustrated reporters will occasionally edit together clips of the guest repeating the same respond over and over again and will air it to show the guest's evasiveness. It's a technique that can severely damage a guest's credibility, but is easy to circumvent - if you construct manifold ways of saying the same thing and retain your messages with definite examples.

Second, this arrival works well if you're defending an ideology or point of view you truly believe in. But if you or your assosication did something wrong, it's not good enough. You'll need to admit your faults, apologize, and declare your operation plan to make it better.

And third, this arrival worked because the interview was taped, not live. If the program was live, the audience would have quickly tired of Susan's antics. But since she knew that Dateline Nbc tends to use short sound bites instead of longer interviews, she was safe bet the audience would never see her repetitive messaging technique.

The End Game

In the end, both women performed their jobs admirably. Ms. Thompson led a tough journalistic investigation, exposing an business that probably deserved the scrutiny. And, as for Susan? She represented her organization's point of view perfectly.

I hope you obtain new knowledge about Employment. Where you possibly can offer use within your evryday life. And most significantly, your reaction is passed about Employment.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Bluehost Review